Works-in-Progress: Call for Participation

A schedule of all due dates can be found on the Submissions page.

Works-in-Progress (WIP) Quick Facts

Submission Deadline: 9 Jan 2012 (23:55 PST) using the PCS Submission System
- see PCS Submission Instructions for new procedures.
Notification Date: 10 Feb 2012
Camera-Ready Deadline: 17 Feb 2012
Submission Format: A six-page poster abstract prepared in Extended Abstract Format format and thoroughly copy-edited. Submissions are not anonymous and should include all author names, affiliations, and contact information. Your poster design should be reduced to one standard letter page in size and submitted in PDF format. Both documents should be submitted via the PCS submission system.
Selection process: Juried
At the Conference: Accepted submissions will be presented as a poster during the conference. Please see the Information for Poster Presenters.
After the Conference: Extended Abstracts (DVD and ACM Digital Library).

Message from the Works-in-Progress Chairs

We encourage practitioners and researchers to submit Works-in-Progress as it provides a unique opportunity for sharing valuable ideas, eliciting useful feedback on early-stage work, and fostering discussions and collaborations among colleagues. Accepted submissions will be presented as a poster at the conference and made available to the CHI community as a six-page poster abstract in the Extended Abstracts proceedings.

Lichan Hong (Google, CA, USA)
Henriette Cramer (Mobile Life Centre, Stockholm, Sweden)

wip@chi2012.acm.org

What is a Work-in-Progress?

A Work-in-Progress is a concise report of recent findings or other types of innovative or thought-provoking work relevant to the CHI community. The difference between Works-in-Progress and other contribution types (e.g. papers and notes) is that Work-in-Progress submissions represents work that has not reach a level of completion that would warrant the full Refereed selection process. That said, appropriate submissions should make some contribution to the body of HCI knowledge, whether realized or promised. A significant benefit of a Work-in-Progress derives from the discussion between the author and conference attendees that will be fostered by the face-to-face presentation of the work.

This submission category aims to attract participation from a broad range of disciplines covering a spectrum of topics and methodologies. We encourage submissions from all of CHI's communities. Summaries of completed work or reduced versions of short or full paper submissions are inappropriate as a Work-in-Progress submission and will be rejected. Submissions may include, but are not limited to, the following types of work:

Evaluations of systems, techniques, practices or other phenomena relevant to HCI.
Descriptions of new methods, processes, techniques, or tools for use in interactive system design, development or deployment.
Reflections from practice, including lessons learned or principles derived from real-word experiences and backed by thought-provoking and well-substantiated analyses.
Accounts of the design (rationale, process, outcomes and/or evaluation) of innovative applications, user interfaces, or systems.

Work-in-Progress abstracts appear in the CHI Extended abstracts. Copyright is retained by the authors, and the material from them can be used as the basis for future publications as long as there are "significant" revisions from the original.

For more information on the republishability of material appearing at CHI, along with links to relevant ACM policies, please see the section on Republishability on the main CHI CFP.

Preparing and Submitting your Work-in-Progress

Work-in-Progress submissions consist of two related documents:

A six-page poster abstract prepared in the Extended Abstract Format and submitted as a PDF file. Your poster abstract should be camera-ready and thoroughly copy-edited. Work-in-Progress submissions are not anonymous and should therefore include all author names, affiliations and contact information.
An electronic version of the poster that you will present at the conference. For the review process, your poster should be reduced to one standard page in size and submitted as a PDF file. Please note that the physical posters presented at the conference may not be larger than 4 feet by 4 feet.

Due to the short review cycle, there should be nearly no changes between your submissions and the camera-ready final documents, except in rare circumstances.

Both the poster abstract and the poster should communicate:

A concise description of the work
Implications of the work for the CHI community
Recommendations for further investigation and/or incorporation into practice

Work-in-Progress Selection Process

Work-in-Progress submissions will be selected by an anonymous jury. The process has been designed to acknowledge the early-stage nature of the work. All submissions are considered confidential during the review process.

Review Criteria

Each submission will be reviewed on the following criteria:

Significance: How important is the problem or question that this submission addresses? How important is the output of this work in contributing to the identified problem or question? How greatly can others benefit from this work?
Originality: How novel is the contribution? How clearly does the submission communicate the ways that it differs from and goes beyond the most relevant previous work in this area? (Note that for a Work-in-Progress submission, full literature searches are not expected, although the most relevant citations should be included.)
Validity: How appropriate are the chosen methods for the work being undertaken? How well are the submission's claims and conclusions supported by the results?
Written Presentation: How clear and understandable is the writing in the poster abstract? To what extent does the poster abstract conform to all Extended Abstract formatting requirements and the 6-page limit?
Visual Presentation (The Poster): How well does the design of the poster effectively communicate the most important facets of the work? To what degree is the design of the poster likely to draw in an audience?
Ability of the Work to Engender Discussion: To what degree will the presentation of this work stimulate interesting conversation among researchers or practitioners? To what extent will the presenters benefit from being able to discuss their work and receive feedback at this stage?

Upon Acceptance of your Work-in-Progress Submission

Work-in-Progress authors will be notified of acceptance. If a submission is accepted to appear at the conference, the contact person will receive further instructions regarding the inclusion of their poster abstract in the Extended Abstracts, as well as instructions for the poster presentation at the conference.

At the Conference

Accepted Work-in-Progress posters will be presented during the conference. Authors will be expected to attend the conference and will be assigned a time and location to present their poster to conference attendees. Authors will be required to set up beforehand and stand with their posters during the assigned time. Please see the Information for Poster Presenters.

After the Conference

Accepted Work-in-Progress poster abstracts will be distributed in the CHI Extended Abstracts, distributed by the conference and in the ACM Digital Library, where they will remain accessible to researchers and practitioners worldwide.

WiP Program Committee Members

Jason Alexander, Lancaster University
Madeline Balaam, Newcastle, UK
Frank Bentley, Motorola Mobility Research, USA
Sven Bertel, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany
Fatima Boujarwah, Georgia Tech, USA
Stacy Branham, Virginia Tech, USA
Kelly Caine, Indiana University, USA
Jilin Chen, Palo Alto Research Center, USA
Yunan Chen, University of California, Irvine, USA
Fanny Chevalier, OCAD University, Canada
Karen Church, Telefonica Research, Spain
Gregorio Convertino, Xerox Research Centre Europe and Palo Alto Research Center, USA
Lisa Cowan, University of California, San Diego, USA
David Coyle, University of Cambridge, UK
R. Jordan Crouser, Tufts University, USA
Sarah Diefenbach, Folkwang University of the Arts, Germany
Haakon Faste, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Elizabeth Goodman, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Catherine Grevet, Georgia Tech, USA
David Gurzick, Hood College, USA
Sean Gustafson, Hasso Plattner Institute, Germany
Ben Hanrahan, Virginia Tech & PARC, USA
Leanne Hirshfield, Hamilton College, USA
Jina Huh, University of Washington, USA
Mikkel Jakobsen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Heekyoung Jung, University of Cincinnati, USA
Kostas Kazakos, University of Melbourne, Australia
Stephen Kimani, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya
Gilly Leshed, Cornell University, USA
Vincent Levesque, Immersion Corp., Canada
Ilaria Liccardi, INRIA, France
Janne Lindqvist, Rutgers University, USA
Sara Ljungblad, LOTS Design, Sweden
Kurt Luther, Georgia Tech, USA
Xiaojuan Ma, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Mari-Carmen, Marcos University Pompeu Fabra, Spain
Emanuela Mazzone, University of Central Lancashire, UK
Yevgeniy Medynskiy, Georgia Tech, USA
Scarlett Miller, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Lennart Nacke, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Michael Nebeling, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
Petteri Nurmi, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Finland
Lora Oehlberg, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Tyler Pace, Indiana University, USA
Sameer Patil, Indiana University, USA
Evan Peck, Tufts University, USA
Reid Priedhorsky, Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA
Alex Quinn, University of Maryland, USA
Stuart Reeves, University of Nottingham, UK
Anne Roudaut, Hasso Plattner Institute, Germany
Antti Salovaara, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Aalto University, Finland
David Sirkin, Stanford University, USA
Erin Solovey, MIT, USA
Lucio Davide Spano, CNR, Italy
Gunnar Stevens, University of Siegen, Germany
Fred Stutzman, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Bongwon Suh, Adobe, USA
Petra Sundstrom, Salzburg University, Austria
Craig Tashman, Georgia Tech, USA
Monica Tentori, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexico
Tammy Toscos, Indiana University, USA
Zachary O. Toups, Texas Engineering Extension Service and Texas Center for Applied Technology, USA
Kate Tsui, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, USA
Wouter Walmink, RMIT University, Australia
Yang Wang Carnegie, Mellon University, USA
Jason Wiese Carnegie, Mellon University, USA
Lauren Wilcox-Patterson, Columbia University, USA
Wesley Willett, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Heather Wiltse, Indiana University, USA
Marco Winckler, University Paul Sabatier, France
Naomi Yamashita, NTT Lab, Japan
Sarita Yardi, Georgia Tech, USA
Xiaolong "Luke" Zhang, Penn State University, USA

On This Page